GenGrades
EN中文

这篇内容还没有中文版

下面是英文原文。中文版发布后,这里会换成中文。 打开英文页面

Replicate after Cloudflare: pricing, MCP and alternatives

发布于 更新于

Replicate 标志replicate.com按量计费网页API命令行
The Replicate homepage: run and fine-tune models with one line of code.
The Replicate homepage: run and fine-tune models with one line of code.截自 replicate.com截图日期

Replicate 是什么

先用一两句话说清楚。

Replicate is an API for running AI models, owned by Cloudflare since a $57.4 million acquisition closed on December 1, 2025. It sells 100+ official models such as Veo 3.1, Nano Banana Pro and Kling 3.0 per output, and 50,000+ community models by the second of GPU time.

主要功能

它能做什么,每项一句话,以及我们有没有实测。

  • Official models priced per output

    More than 100 'official' models kept always on with a stable API and per-output prices, including Veo 3.1, Nano Banana Pro, Kling 3.0, Seedance 2.0, FLUX 2, GPT Image 2 and a few language models such as Claude.

    Replicate's docs say official models are maintained 'with the authors'.

  • Community and private models by the second

    More than 50,000 open and fine-tuned models billed per second of hardware: T4 $0.81 an hour, L40S $3.51, A100 80GB $5.04, H100 $5.49. Private models are billed for all time online, idle included.

    Replicate's pricing page; the 50,000 count is Cloudflare's (November 2025). Community models can cold-start.

  • Cog for deploying your own model

    Package a model with the open-source Cog tool and run it on the same API and bill, with deployments that set minimum and maximum instances.

    Cog v0.23.1 was released on October 19, 2026 (GitHub).

  • One-hour default data retention

    Inputs, outputs, files and logs of API predictions are deleted after one hour by default; web-interface predictions are kept until deleted.

    Replicate's data retention docs.

  • Official MCP server and Agent Skills

    A remote MCP server at mcp.replicate.com and a local npm package (replicate-mcp), plus seven Agent Skills in replicate/skills for finding, comparing, running and prompting models.

    MCP server launched August 14, 2025 and skills April 21, 2026, per Replicate's changelog.

  • Fallback for Nano Banana Pro

    Opt-in fallback to Seedream 5.0 lite when Google's API is at capacity, billed at the fallback model's price.

    Replicate changelog, March 2, 2026. There is no general cross-provider routing.

适合谁

它帮得上谁、解决什么问题、在哪个榜单里。

适合

  • Developers who want fast access to open image and video models with pay-per-use billing
  • Teams that fine-tune or package their own models and want them on the same API
  • Apps that handle user uploads and want short default data retention
  • Claude Code, Codex or Cursor users who want an official MCP server and skills for running models

解决的问题

  • Hosting a custom model without managing GPUs
  • Choosing among thousands of models without testing each by hand
  • Keeping user inputs and outputs longer than needed
  • Separate accounts for each model maker's API

擅长什么

别人公开做过的测试:给了它什么、结果怎样。

  1. 案例 1

    In Artificial Analysis' image provider benchmark (three-day medians read October 21, 2026): open image models across providers

    输入

    Qwen-Image and FLUX.1 [schnell] images generated from the same scheduled prompts on Replicate, fal and WaveSpeedAI.

    结果

    Replicate's medians were 8.0 s on Qwen-Image (fal 40.1 s, WaveSpeedAI 24.8 s) and 2.2 s on FLUX.1 [schnell] (fal 3.2 s, WaveSpeedAI 11.0 s), all at $3 per 1,000 schnell images. Its FLUX.1 [dev] p95 of 25.1 s shows occasional long waits, and only open-weight models are covered.

  2. 案例 2

    In AI Photo Labs' Replicate vs fal test (March 30, 2026): FLUX and SDXL under load

    输入

    FLUX.1 Schnell and Dev runs sent one at a time, and SDXL runs sent in bursts of 4 and 8 requests, timing queue, run and total time.

    结果

    Replicate was faster on FLUX (about 1.40 s against fal's 3.49 s on Dev) but much slower on an 8-request SDXL burst (about 21.5 s against 3.3 s), with about 17.6 s spent queueing. The operator is unnamed and the sample small.

  3. 案例 3

    Per Replicate's changelog and skills repository: model work from a coding agent

    输入

    Claude Code with the skills installed (npx skills add replicate/skills) and the remote MCP server added, asked to find, compare and run an image model.

    结果

    The skills add model-selection and prompting guidance and the MCP server makes the API calls, as Replicate describes the pairing. Runs bill like any other prediction, and Replicate's docs say claude.ai needs the remote server rather than the local package.

短板

做得不好的地方和证据,以及我们还没法定论的地方。

做得不好

做得不好

  • Google's models cost more on Replicate than on Google's API.

    证据: Nano Banana Pro is $0.15 per 1K or 2K image against Google's $0.134 ($0.30 against $0.24 at 4K); Veo 3.1 Fast with audio is $0.15 a second against $0.10 at 720p (Replicate's model pages and Google's Gemini API pricing, October 21, 2026).

  • Kling 3.0 costs twice what fal and WaveSpeedAI charge.

    证据: $0.168 a second without audio and $0.252 with audio on the tier Replicate labels standard, against $0.084 and $0.126 on fal and WaveSpeedAI (each model page, October 21, 2026).

  • Support complaints through 2026.

    证据: Trustpilot: 1.8 out of 5 from 16 reviews, 94% one star, unclaimed profile with no replies. An August 17, 2026 Ask HN thread asked whether a functioning team remains. GitHub issues, including a reported billing loop on a disabled deployment (#382, August 24, 2026), have no replies.

  • Product direction unclear after the acquisition.

    证据: Replicate's changelog has no entry after April 21, 2026 and its blog none after April 15. Its status page moved to Cloudflare's, and Cloudflare's plan to bring Replicate's models to AI Gateway (April 16, 2026) was not visibly live on October 21, 2026.

  • Credit expires after a year.

    证据: Prepaid credit expires 12 months after purchase and is non-refundable (terms); Trustpilot reviewers in September and October 2026 report losing credit after a year of non-use.

  • Not for teams that need responsive support or mainly buy Kling or Google's models.

    证据: Kling 3.0 is half the price on fal and WaveSpeedAI, Google's models are cheaper on Google's API, and public support requests have gone unanswered for weeks.

尚不确定

尚不确定

  • Whether Replicate's models will move to Cloudflare AI Gateway, and whether prices or billing will change.

    原因: Cloudflare announced the plan on April 16, 2026 without a date; its August 7, 2026 update did not mention Replicate.

  • Real uptime.

    原因: No uptime percentage or self-serve SLA is published, and Cloudflare's status history shows no incident details for Replicate.

  • Whether the Seedance 2.0 price includes audio.

    原因: Replicate's Seedance 2.0 page lists $0.18 a second at 720p without saying.

  • Minimum one-time top-up and accepted cards.

    原因: The docs state only the auto-reload minimums ($15 at a $5 threshold).

价格、限制与格式

每个数字都附来源和核对日期。

项目数值备注与来源
OperatorReplicate, LLC, a subsidiary of Cloudflare, Inc. (San Francisco)

来源:replicate.com核对于

AcquisitionClosed December 1, 2025; total purchase cash consideration $57.4 million, $46.6 million recorded as goodwill

Cloudflare's annual report for 2025 (Form 10-K).

来源:sec.gov核对于

Price against the maker's listAbove Google's list: Nano Banana Pro $0.15 vs $0.134; Veo 3.1 Fast with audio $0.15/s vs $0.10/s; Veo 3.1 at 1080p the same $0.40/s. No platform fee stated

Google's prices from its Gemini API pricing page, updated October 19, 2026.

来源:replicate.com核对于

Minimum top up and paymentPrepaid credit with a payment method on file; one-time minimum not stated; auto-reload minimum $15 at a $5 threshold

来源:replicate.com核对于

Free tierSelect models free for a short while; no fixed free credit; accounts without a payment method limited to 1 request a second

来源:replicate.com核对于

Models100+ official models priced per output; 50,000+ community and fine-tuned models billed per second

来源:replicate.com核对于

API formatsReplicate's own predictions API (sync wait, polling, webhooks, streaming); no OpenAI- or Anthropic-compatible endpoint in its docs

来源:replicate.com核对于

MCPOfficial: remote server at mcp.replicate.com and local npm package replicate-mcp; search models, run predictions, check status

来源:replicate.com核对于

Agent SkillsSeven official skills in replicate/skills (April 21, 2026): npx skills add replicate/skills

来源:github.com核对于

Coding agentsMCP setup for Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor and VS Code Copilot; Codex CLI and Gemini CLI named; skills for Claude Code, OpenCode, Codex and Pi

来源:replicate.com核对于

Data retentionAPI inputs, outputs, files and logs deleted after 1 hour by default; web predictions kept until deleted

来源:replicate.com核对于

Status pageListed on cloudflarestatus.com; operational on October 21, 2026; no uptime figure or self-serve SLA

来源:cloudflarestatus.com核对于

Credit expiry and refundsPrepaid credit expires 12 months after purchase and is non-refundable; failed runs on public models not charged

来源:replicate.com核对于

常见问题

先给结论,再讲原因、例子、限制和下一步。

Did Cloudflare buy Replicate?

Cloudflare bought Replicate in a deal that closed on December 1, 2025. Cloudflare's annual report for 2025 puts the total purchase cash consideration at $57.4 million. Replicate said at the announcement that "the API isn't changing", and as of October 21, 2026 its API and per-output prices show no published change.

原因

The Replicate team has joined Cloudflare's AI Platform group, and Replicate's status page now lives on Cloudflare's.

Is Replicate cheaper than the official APIs?

Replicate is not cheaper than Google for Google's own models. Nano Banana Pro costs $0.15 per 1K or 2K image against $0.134 on Google's API, and Veo 3.1 Fast with audio $0.15 a second against $0.10 at 720p; Veo 3.1 at 1080p is the same $0.40 a second on both.

限制

Replicate is the cheapest of fal, WaveSpeedAI, Kie.ai and Replicate on Seedance 2.0 at 720p ($0.18 a second), but its page does not say whether audio is included.

Is Replicate safe to use?

Replicate is a Cloudflare subsidiary with a one-hour default retention for API data, but support complaints are frequent. API inputs, outputs and logs are deleted after one hour unless you change it, and customers own their outputs. Trustpilot scores it 1.8 out of 5, and GitHub issues about billing have gone unanswered.

限制

Prepaid credit expires after 12 months and is non-refundable.

Does Replicate support MCP?

Replicate publishes an official MCP server, both hosted and local. The remote server is at mcp.replicate.com and the local one is the npm package replicate-mcp; setup is documented for Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor and VS Code, and seven Agent Skills in replicate/skills add guidance on picking and prompting models.

Replicate vs fal: which should I use?

Replicate and fal charge the same for Veo 3.1 and Nano Banana Pro, so price differences come down to other models. Replicate is twice fal's price on Kling 3.0 and cheaper on Seedance 2.0. In Artificial Analysis' medians Replicate was faster on Qwen-Image, FLUX.2 [dev] and Wan 2.2, and fal on MiniMax H3 and FLUX.2 [klein] 9B.

下一步

Replicate suits teams deploying their own models with Cog; fal has a larger catalog of partner media models.

What are the alternatives to Replicate?

The closest alternatives to Replicate are fal, WaveSpeedAI and Kie.ai, plus the makers' own APIs. fal and WaveSpeedAI charge half Replicate's price for Kling 3.0, WaveSpeedAI accepts Alipay and WeChat Pay and its credits do not expire, and Kie.ai is far cheaper on Google's models but does not say how it gets access.

更多截图

  • Replicate's pricing page: most models are billed by hardware time, some by input and output.
    Replicate's pricing page: most models are billed by hardware time, some by input and output.截自 replicate.com截图日期

公开测试怎么说

This page is built from Replicate's own site, docs, changelog and terms, Cloudflare's announcements and 2025 annual report, Google's Gemini API price list, the model pages of fal, WaveSpeedAI and Kie.ai, Artificial Analysis' provider benchmarks, an AI Photo Labs test, and user reports on Trustpilot, Hacker News and GitHub, all checked on October 21, 2026. Replicate's claims are labelled as its own.

What Replicate sells

Replicate runs AI models behind one API. Its docs describe "over 100 official models" that are always on, priced per output and maintained with their authors: Veo 3.1, Nano Banana Pro, Kling 3.0, Seedance 2.0, FLUX 2, GPT Image 2 and a few language models such as Claude. Beyond those, Cloudflare counts more than 50,000 community and fine-tuned models, billed per second of hardware (an A100 80GB at $5.04 an hour, an H100 at $5.49). Private models are billed for all time online, idle included. You can package your own model with Replicate's open-source Cog tool and run it on the same bill.

Since July 16, 2025 new accounts pay with prepaid credit, and there is no fixed free credit.

The Cloudflare acquisition

Cloudflare announced on November 17, 2025 that it would buy Replicate, and the deal closed on December 1, 2025. Cloudflare's annual report for 2025 puts the total purchase cash consideration at $57.4 million, $46.6 million of it recorded as goodwill. At the announcement Replicate said "the API isn't changing", and its API and per-output prices show no published change since.

Other things have moved: Replicate's status page now redirects to Cloudflare's. On April 16, 2026 Cloudflare said the Replicate team had joined its AI Platform group and that Replicate's models would come to its AI Gateway; as of October 21, 2026 that was not visibly live, and Cloudflare's August 7, 2026 post merging Workers AI and AI Gateway does not mention Replicate. Replicate's public changelog has been quiet since April 21, 2026.

Prices against the official APIs

Prices in US dollars, from each service's own model or pricing page and Google's Gemini API pricing (updated October 19, 2026):

Model and outputGoogle's listReplicatefalWaveSpeedAIKie.ai
Veo 3.1 Fast, 8 s at 720p with audio0.801.201.201.200.30
Veo 3.1, 8 s at 1080p with audio3.203.203.203.201.275
Nano Banana Pro, one 1K or 2K image0.1340.150.150.140.09
Nano Banana Pro, one 4K image0.240.300.300.240.12
Kling 3.0 Standard, per second without / with audionot confirmed0.168 / 0.2520.084 / 0.1260.084 / 0.1260.07 / 0.10 (720p)
Seedance 2.0, per second at 720pnot confirmed0.180.3034 (with audio)0.240.205

Google's models cost more on Replicate than on Google's API: Veo 3.1 Fast 50% more, Nano Banana Pro about 12% more (25% at 4K), exactly what fal charges; Veo 3.1 at 1080p matches Google. Kling's and BytePlus's own prices could not be confirmed, so the last two rows compare the four services only. Replicate charges double what fal and WaveSpeedAI charge for Kling 3.0 (on its tier labelled "standard") and is the cheapest of the four on Seedance 2.0, though its page does not say whether audio is included. Kie.ai is lower on Google's models but does not say how it gets access. Replicate lists no platform fee.

What public tests show

Artificial Analysis, an independent benchmarking firm, runs the same prompts on several providers every day. Its three-day median end-to-end times, read on October 21, 2026:

ModelReplicatefalWaveSpeedAI
FLUX.1 [schnell] image2.2 s3.2 s11.0 s
FLUX.1 [dev] image4.2 snot listed14.9 s
FLUX.2 [dev] image6.4 s15.6 snot listed
Qwen-Image8.0 s40.1 s24.8 s
Z-Image Turbo image1.4 s2.0 snot listed
Wan 2.2 A14B, 5 s video at 720p85.2 s271.6 snot listed
Vidu Q3 Pro, 5 s video at 720p117.1 s117.8 s105.7 s

Replicate was the fastest or near-fastest of the three on most shared models (its Wan figure is its Fast endpoint). Two caveats: its FLUX.1 [dev] p95 was 25.1 s, a sign of occasional cold starts or queueing, and it charged $25 per 1,000 FLUX.1 [dev] images against WaveSpeedAI's $12. On FLUX.2 [klein] 4B it was the cheapest at $1 per 1,000. Only open-weight models are covered.

AI Photo Labs, a comparison site whose operator is not named, timed Replicate against fal on March 30, 2026. Replicate was faster on FLUX (about 1.40 s against 3.49 s on FLUX.1 Dev) but much slower on a burst of eight SDXL requests (about 21.5 s against 3.3 s), about 17.6 s of it spent queueing. The sample is small.

A September 2026 DEV post by mrzitoun reports a 6.5 s median cold start for Replicate on an A100 against 1.8 s on Modal, without a described method. WaveSpeedAI's blog claims Replicate takes 2 to 5 minutes per video; that is a competitor's claim with no method shown.

What users report

Trustpilot shows 1.8 out of 5 from 16 reviews, 94% one star, on an unclaimed profile with no replies. Reviewers report Seedance requests blocked by a "copyright" moderation error with funds stuck in credit (October 9, 2026), prepaid credit lost after a year of non-use (September and October 2026), and unanswered support tickets.

On Hacker News, an August 17, 2026 thread asked "Is there still a functioning team behind replicate.com?" after a support request went unanswered for a week while the LoRA trainer returned HTTP 500 errors. On GitHub, issues in the JavaScript client sit without replies, including a reported billing loop on a disabled private deployment (#382, August 24, 2026). The Cog repository is still active, with v0.23.1 released on October 19, 2026.

MCP, Agent Skills and coding agents

Replicate publishes an official MCP server in two forms: a remote server at mcp.replicate.com, launched August 14, 2025, and a local npm package, replicate-mcp. Its tools cover the HTTP API: searching models, reading metadata, running predictions and checking status. Setup is documented for Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor and VS Code with GitHub Copilot, and the docs name Codex CLI and Gemini CLI as compatible. An experimental "code mode" instead lets the agent write TypeScript against the Replicate SDK in a sandbox.

On April 21, 2026 Replicate published seven Agent Skills in its replicate/skills repository (find-models, compare-models, run-models, build-models, publish-models, prompt-images, prompt-videos), installed with npx skills add replicate/skills and aimed at Claude Code, OpenCode, Codex and Pi. Replicate pairs them with MCP: the server makes the calls, the skills give the guidance.

Replicate has no OpenAI- or Anthropic-compatible endpoint in its docs, so it is not a drop-in model backend for coding agents. Official clients exist for Python (a new SDK in public beta since October 2025) and JavaScript; the Vercel AI SDK has a Replicate provider for images, LiteLLM supports Replicate models, and Replicate generates llms.txt files for its docs.

Privacy, terms and who runs it

  • The contracting company is Replicate, LLC, a Cloudflare subsidiary, under terms updated April 1, 2026.
  • API predictions' inputs, outputs, files and logs are deleted after one hour by default; predictions made in the web interface are kept until you delete them.
  • Customers own their data and outputs, subject to model licences. Replicate's licence covers using customer data to build that customer's fine-tuned models, and anonymized aggregate data to improve its services.
  • Prepaid credit expires 12 months after purchase and is non-refundable. Failed runs on public models are not charged.
  • California law applies, with AAA arbitration and no class actions.
  • No uptime figure or self-serve SLA is published. Cloudflare's status page listed Replicate as operational on October 21, 2026, with incidents on 2 of the last 30 days and no details shown.

How it compares with fal, WaveSpeedAI and Kie.ai

fal charges the same for Google's models and half as much for Kling 3.0, and publishes a full incident history. WaveSpeedAI also halves the Kling price, accepts Alipay and WeChat Pay, and keeps credits forever. Kie.ai is cheapest on Google's models but does not say how it gets access. Teams on Cloudflare can send Replicate calls, with their own token, through Cloudflare AI Gateway for logging and control.

Who should skip it

Skip Replicate if you need quick answers from support or a clear roadmap now, or if you mainly buy Kling or Google's models, which are cheaper elsewhere. Spend any credit within a year.

来源

来源

  1. Replicate homepage (Replicate) (replicate.com), 访问于
  2. Replicate pricing: hardware and models (Replicate) (replicate.com), 访问于
  3. Replicate docs: official models (replicate.com), 访问于
  4. Replicate docs: billing and free use (replicate.com), 访问于
  5. Replicate docs: prepaid credit (replicate.com), 访问于
  6. Replicate docs: data retention (replicate.com), 访问于
  7. Replicate docs: rate limits (replicate.com), 访问于
  8. Replicate docs: MCP server (replicate.com), 访问于
  9. Replicate changelog: MCP server, Agent Skills, llms.txt, SDKs (replicate.com), 访问于
  10. replicate/skills: Agent Skills for Replicate (GitHub) (github.com), 访问于
  11. Replicate terms of service (updated April 1, 2026) (replicate.com), 访问于
  12. Veo 3.1 on Replicate (Replicate) (replicate.com), 访问于
  13. Veo 3.1 Fast on Replicate (Replicate) (replicate.com), 访问于
  14. Nano Banana Pro on Replicate (Replicate) (replicate.com), 访问于
  15. Kling 3.0 on Replicate (Replicate) (replicate.com), 访问于
  16. Seedance 2.0 on Replicate (Replicate) (replicate.com), 访问于
  17. Cloudflare to acquire Replicate (Cloudflare press release, November 17, 2025) (cloudflare.com), 访问于
  18. Replicate joins Cloudflare (Cloudflare blog) (blog.cloudflare.com), 访问于
  19. Cloudflare Form 10-K for 2025: Replicate acquisition (SEC) (sec.gov), 访问于
  20. Cloudflare's AI Platform (Cloudflare blog, April 16, 2026) (blog.cloudflare.com), 访问于
  21. Workers AI and AI Gateway unification (Cloudflare blog, August 7, 2026) (blog.cloudflare.com), 访问于
  22. Replicate on Cloudflare's status page (cloudflarestatus.com), 访问于
  23. Replicate provider for Cloudflare AI Gateway (Cloudflare docs) (developers.cloudflare.com), 访问于
  24. Replicate provider for the Vercel AI SDK (Vercel) (ai-sdk.dev), 访问于
  25. Replicate provider (LiteLLM docs) (docs.litellm.ai), 访问于
  26. Gemini API pricing: Veo 3.1 and Nano Banana Pro (Google, updated October 19, 2026) (ai.google.dev), 访问于
  27. FLUX.1 [schnell] provider benchmark (Artificial Analysis) (artificialanalysis.ai), 访问于
  28. FLUX.1 [dev] provider benchmark (Artificial Analysis) (artificialanalysis.ai), 访问于
  29. FLUX.2 [dev] provider benchmark (Artificial Analysis) (artificialanalysis.ai), 访问于
  30. FLUX.2 [klein] 4B provider benchmark (Artificial Analysis) (artificialanalysis.ai), 访问于
  31. Qwen-Image provider benchmark (Artificial Analysis) (artificialanalysis.ai), 访问于
  32. Z-Image Turbo provider benchmark (Artificial Analysis) (artificialanalysis.ai), 访问于
  33. Wan 2.2 A14B video provider benchmark (Artificial Analysis) (artificialanalysis.ai), 访问于
  34. Vidu Q3 Pro video provider benchmark (Artificial Analysis) (artificialanalysis.ai), 访问于
  35. Replicate vs fal.ai inference comparison (AI Photo Labs, March 30, 2026) (aiphotolabs.com), 访问于
  36. Benchmarking serverless GPU cold starts: Modal vs RunPod vs Replicate (mrzitoun, DEV, September 2026) (dev.to), 访问于
  37. Replicate review 2026 (WaveSpeedAI blog, a competitor) (wavespeed.ai), 访问于
  38. Replicate reviews: 1.8 out of 5 from 16 reviews (Trustpilot) (trustpilot.com), 访问于
  39. Ask HN: Is there still a functioning team behind replicate.com? (Hacker News, August 17, 2026) (news.ycombinator.com), 访问于
  40. replicate-javascript issue #382: billing on a disabled deployment (GitHub) (github.com), 访问于
  41. replicate/cog (GitHub) (github.com), 访问于
  42. Kling 3.0 Standard text-to-video on fal (fal) (fal.ai), 访问于
  43. Seedance 2.0 text-to-video on fal (fal) (fal.ai), 访问于
  44. Nano Banana Pro on fal (fal) (fal.ai), 访问于
  45. Kling 3.0 Std on WaveSpeedAI (WaveSpeedAI) (wavespeed.ai), 访问于
  46. Veo 3.1 Fast on WaveSpeedAI (WaveSpeedAI) (wavespeed.ai), 访问于
  47. Kie.ai pricing table (Kie.ai) (kie.ai), 访问于

更新记录

更新记录

  1. Page created from Replicate's own pages, public tests and user reports.

GenGrades 推荐阅读

  • 工具评测

    APIMODELS

    APIMODELS 是一家按量付费的 AI API 中转站,用一个 Key 提供约 150 个模型,价格自定、多数低于厂商官方价,省下的利润投在备用渠道上:近 30 天去掉内容审核拒绝后,请求成功率 98.62%。APIMODELS 是我们自己的产品,和 GenGrades 出自同一团队。

  • 工具评测

    WaveSpeedAI

    WaveSpeedAI is an API platform, run by a Singapore company and a Hong Kong company named in its terms, that sells 1,000+ image, video, audio and 3D models plus an LLM service on one balance. It matches fal on Kling 3.0, charges above Google's list for Veo 3.1 Fast and accepts Alipay and WeChat Pay.

  • 工具评测

    Vercel AI Gateway

    Vercel AI Gateway is Vercel's hosted API for about 480 text, image, video and speech models behind one key, billed from prepaid credits at the providers' list prices with no markup, including when you bring your own keys. It became generally available on August 21, 2025, and gives each Vercel team 5 USD of free credit a month.

  • 工具评测

    fal

    fal is a San Francisco API platform, run by Features & Labels, Inc., that sells per-output access to more than 1,000 image, video, audio and 3D models on one prepaid balance. Its open models are cheap, but Google partner models such as Veo 3.1 Fast and Nano Banana Pro cost more on fal than on Google's own API.

  • 工具评测

    Eden AI

    Eden AI is a Lyon-based API gateway, run by Eden AI SAS, that puts about 500 language models and 250 'expert' models for OCR, speech, translation and image work behind one key and one prepaid balance. It passes provider prices through and, since January 2026, adds a 5.5% platform fee on self-serve credits.

  • 工具评测

    CometAPI

    CometAPI is a prepaid API service that sells text, image, video and audio models through one key at, by its own rule, 80% of the makers' list prices. Its terms and privacy pages name no company and use Hong Kong law, and it says it reaches the low prices through bulk credit buying and routing.