GenGrades

Kie.ai review: prices vs official APIs, MCP and is it legit

Published Updated

Kie.ai logokie.aiCreditsWebAPI
The Kie.ai homepage: one API for video, image, music and language models.
The Kie.ai homepage: one API for video, image, music and language models.Screenshot of kie.aitaken

What Kie.ai is

In one or two sentences, before anything else.

Kie.ai is a credit-based API service, run by two Denver LLCs, that sells access to other companies' video, image, music and language models at prices well below the makers' own, such as Veo 3.1 Quality at $1.275 per 1080p clip against Google's $3.20. It does not say how it obtains that access.

Main features

What it can do, one sentence each, and whether we actually tested it.

  • One credit balance for many makers' models

    590 price rows across 22 maker labels: Veo 3.1, Kling 3.0, Seedance 2, Runway, Nano Banana Pro, GPT Image 2, Flux, Suno, Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6.1 Sol and Gemini 4 Argon on one key.

    Kie.ai's pricing table; it names no partnership, licence or reseller status with these makers.

  • Prices below the makers' list prices

    Veo 3.1 Quality at 1080p for $1.275 against Google's $3.20; Nano Banana Pro for $0.09 against $0.134; Claude Opus 5.5 at $1.60 / $8.00 per million tokens against Anthropic's $4 / $20.

    Its own discount column is headed 'Official / Fal Price' and often measures against fal rather than the maker.

  • Credits that do not expire

    Credits cost $0.005 each (200 per dollar) on 582 of 590 rows; new accounts get 80 free credits and credits never expire.

    The 200-per-dollar rate and the $0.40 value of the free credits are arithmetic from Kie.ai's pricing table.

  • No charge for failed generations

    Kie.ai lists 'Failed Tasks $0' and says pre-deducted credits for failed tasks come back automatically.

    Trustpilot reviewers in June and October 2026 say credits were used on jobs stuck at 99%.

  • Task API with callbacks

    Image, video and music jobs return a task ID that you poll or receive by callback; the default limit is 20 new requests per 10 seconds, and excess requests get a 429 error.

    Per Kie.ai's docs; support can raise the limit.

  • Anthropic and OpenAI endpoints for coding agents

    Anthropic Messages at api.kie.ai/anthropic, with a Claude Code setup guide, and the OpenAI Responses API at api.kie.ai/openai/v1, with a Codex CLI guide.

    Kie.ai's AI agent docs also cover Grok Build.

  • Two Agent Skills

    kie-models lets a coding agent pick, run and download from 200+ media models; kie-chat-agents sets coding agents up on Kie.ai's chat models. Both install with npx skills add https://kie.ai.

    Per Kie.ai's AI agent overview; no official MCP server was found in its docs.

Who it is for

The people it helps and the problems it solves, and where it ranks.

Built for

  • Indie developers and small studios generating images, video or music by API on a tight budget
  • Developers comparing several video and image models before choosing one
  • Hobbyists who want to try paid models with free starter credits
  • Teams on fal, Replicate or WaveSpeedAI comparing per-output prices

Problems it solves

  • Official API prices that make high-volume image and video generation expensive
  • Separate accounts, keys and bills for each model maker
  • Prepaid credits elsewhere that expire
  • Trying a model before committing to its maker's API

What it is good at

Public tests other people ran: what they gave it and how it did.

  1. Case 1

    Per Kie.ai's Veo 3.1 page and pricing table: generating a short video by API

    Input

    A text-to-video task for Veo 3.1 Fast at 720p, 8 seconds long, collected by callback or by polling the task ID.

    What happened

    Kie.ai charges 60 credits, $0.30, for a 4, 6 or 8-second clip, against $0.80 for 8 seconds at Google's rate and $1.20 on fal, Replicate and WaveSpeedAI. Files are deleted after 14 days, its Veo page calls audio experimental, and Trustpilot reviewers report jobs stuck at 99%.

  2. Case 2

    Per Kie.ai's Claude Code guide: running Claude Code on Kie.ai credits

    Input

    Claude Code started with ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL=https://api.kie.ai/anthropic and ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN set to a Kie.ai key, choosing a model listed by GET /anthropic/v1/models.

    What happened

    Claude Opus 5.5 is listed at $1.60 / $8.00 per million tokens, 60% below Anthropic's $4 / $20. Kie.ai does not say how it gets Claude access, the guide does not say whether prompt caching or web search work, and no public test checks that answers come from Opus 5.5.

  3. Case 3

    In AI Softing's two-week trial of Kie.ai's API (July 22, 2026)

    Input

    An agency's integration of Kie.ai's image and video endpoints, from sign-up through two weeks of use.

    What happened

    Onboarding took under 15 minutes and a support reply came about 10 hours after asking; video tasks failed intermittently and had to be retried by hand. The review gives no counts, and its claim that Kie.ai is not a licensed partner cites no source.

Where it falls short

What it does badly, with the evidence, and what we could not settle.

Weak

Weak

  • It does not say how it gets access to the models.

    Evidence: Kie.ai's homepage, About page and terms make no claim to be an authorised reseller or partner of any model maker; the terms say the trademarks shown do not imply endorsement. The About page names two LLCs while the footer reads 'kie.ai Inc.'.

  • Its savings figures overstate the discount against the makers.

    Evidence: The discount column is headed 'Official / Fal Price'. For Veo 3.1 Fast at 720p it compares with $1.20, fal's price, not Google's $0.80, so the claimed 75% saving is 62.5% against Google (pricing table, October 21, 2026).

  • Not the cheapest on every model.

    Evidence: Seedance 2.0 at 720p costs $0.205 a second on Kie.ai against $0.18 on Replicate (each pricing page, October 21, 2026).

  • Public reliability complaints and no status page.

    Evidence: Trustpilot: 2.1 out of 5 from 16 reviews, 81% one star, with jobs stuck at 99% while credits were used (June and October 2026) and 8 to 10 hours of 500 errors (May 2026). There is no public status page, and the homepage claims both 99.9% uptime and 99% availability.

  • Few protections for paying customers or their data.

    Evidence: Accounts can be suspended or closed at Kie.ai's sole discretion without notice; the refund policy gives no conditions or time window; the privacy policy covers only your email address and says nothing about prompts or uploads.

  • Not for confidential data or production systems without a fallback.

    Evidence: With no stated sourcing, no data terms for prompts and outputs, discretionary account closure and public reports of hours-long errors, businesses with customer data or uptime needs should use the makers' own APIs or a provider that states its terms.

Uncertain

Uncertain

  • Whether outputs come from the named model and version.

    Why unsure: No public comparison of Kie.ai's outputs with the makers' APIs was found, and its 'smart fallback routing' is not explained.

  • How long prices this low will last.

    Why unsure: Claude Opus 5.5 at $1.60 / $8.00 is below Anthropic's own Batch rate of $2 / $10, and Kie.ai gives no reason it can sell under the maker's lowest price.

  • Minimum top-up and accepted payment methods.

    Why unsure: The billing page needs a login; a March 2026 Trustpilot reviewer mentions $5 for 1,000 credits, which no Kie.ai page confirms.

  • How representative the complaints are.

    Why unsure: Sixteen Trustpilot reviews are a small, unverified sample, and no news outlet or benchmark has measured Kie.ai.

Price, limits and formats

The numbers, each with its source and the date we checked it.

SpecValueNote and source
OperatorNEXUSAI SERVICES LLC and INNOLEAP AI LLC, 118 Krameria St, Denver, Colorado, US; terms effective August 1, 2025, Colorado law

The site footer reads '© 2026 kie.ai Inc.'.

Source: kie.aichecked

Price against the maker's listVeo 3.1 Quality 1080p $1.275 vs Google $3.20; Nano Banana Pro $0.09 vs $0.134; Claude Opus 5.5 $1.60 / $8.00 per million tokens vs Anthropic $4 / $20

Kie.ai's own discount column is headed 'Official / Fal Price'.

Source: kie.aichecked

Platform feeNone; 'no hidden fees' and 'Failed Tasks $0' claimed

Source: kie.aichecked

Credits and free tier$0.005 a credit (200 per dollar) on 582 of 590 rows; 80 free credits for new users; credits never expire

Source: kie.aichecked

Minimum top up and paymentNot shown on public pages; the billing page needs a login

Source: kie.aichecked

Models590 price rows across 22 maker labels: video, image, music (Suno) and chat models

Source: kie.aichecked

API formatsTask API with callbacks for media; Anthropic Messages at api.kie.ai/anthropic; OpenAI Responses at api.kie.ai/openai/v1; per-model OpenAI Chat Completions for Gemini

Source: docs.kie.aichecked

MCPNo official MCP server found in its docs; third-party wrappers exist

Source: docs.kie.aichecked

Agent SkillsTwo official skills, kie-models and kie-chat-agents: npx skills add https://kie.ai

Source: docs.kie.aichecked

Coding agentsSetup guides for Claude Code, Codex CLI and Grok Build

Source: docs.kie.aichecked

Data retention and rate limitGenerated media 14 days; logs 2 months; 20 new generation requests per 10 seconds

Source: docs.kie.aichecked

Status pageNone found; the homepage claims both 99.9% uptime and 99% availability

Source: kie.aichecked

Refunds"Supported if needed" by email; no conditions or time window stated

Source: kie.aichecked

Website visits, September 2026 (kie.ai)3.1 million (+67.3% on August); 2nd of 10 on AICPB's AI model routers list; 6th of 20 on AICPB's fastest-growing list

Source: mp.weixin.qq.comchecked

Common questions

Answer first, then why, an example, the limits and what to do next.

Is Kie.ai legit?

Kie.ai is a real business with public terms and paying users, but it does not claim to be an authorised reseller of the models it sells. Its About page names two LLCs at a Denver address under terms in force since August 1, 2025, and it does not explain how it gets access to Google, OpenAI, Anthropic or Suno models.

Why

Its terms say the trademarks it shows do not imply endorsement by their owners, and its footer names a third entity, 'kie.ai Inc.'.

Is Kie.ai cheaper than the official APIs?

Kie.ai's list prices are lower than the makers' on every model compared here. Veo 3.1 Quality at 1080p costs $1.275 against Google's $3.20, Nano Banana Pro $0.09 per 1K image against $0.134, and Claude Opus 5.5 $1.60 / $8.00 per million tokens against Anthropic's $4 / $20.

Limits

Its own savings column often measures against fal's prices, its Claude price is below Anthropic's lowest published rate with no explanation, and Replicate is cheaper on Seedance 2.0.

Is Kie.ai reliable?

Public reports about Kie.ai's reliability are mostly negative. It scores 2.1 out of 5 from 16 Trustpilot reviews, with complaints about jobs stuck at 99% while credits are used and hours of 500 errors; it has no public status page, and Kie.ai says credits for failed tasks are returned automatically.

Limits

Sixteen unverified reviews are a small sample, and no benchmark such as Artificial Analysis tracks Kie.ai.

Does Kie.ai have an MCP server?

Kie.ai does not publish an official MCP server in its docs. It offers two Agent Skills instead, kie-models and kie-chat-agents, installed with npx skills add https://kie.ai, plus setup guides for Claude Code, Codex CLI and Grok Build; third-party MCP wrappers exist but are not Kie.ai's own.

Next step

Check any community MCP package's code before giving it your API key.

Can I get a refund from Kie.ai?

Refunds from Kie.ai are possible but not guaranteed. Its refund policy says refunds are "supported if needed" and asks you to email support with your order number, but it gives no conditions or time window.

What does Kie.ai do with my prompts and files?

Kie.ai keeps generated media for 14 days and logs for two months, but its privacy policy does not say what happens to prompts and uploads. The policy covers only your email address, and the terms license your content to Kie.ai for operating and improving the service.

What are the alternatives to Kie.ai?

The main alternatives to Kie.ai are fal, Replicate and WaveSpeedAI for media, OpenRouter for language models, and the makers' own APIs. fal, Replicate and WaveSpeedAI charge $1.20 for an 8-second Veo 3.1 Fast clip against Kie.ai's $0.30, but they name their companies, publish status pages and appear in independent speed benchmarks.

More screenshots

  • The pricing page lists each model's price per generation next to the official or Fal price.
    The pricing page lists each model's price per generation next to the official or Fal price.Screenshot of kie.aitaken

What the public tests show

This page is built from Kie.ai's own site, pricing table, docs and policies, the price pages of Google and Anthropic, the model pages of fal, Replicate and WaveSpeedAI, public reviews by AI Softing, Bitdoze and AI Insights News, and Trustpilot reviews, all checked on October 21, 2026. Kie.ai's claims are labelled as its own.

According to AICPB's traffic rankings, kie.ai had 3.1 million visits in September 2026, up 67.3% on August: 2nd among AI model routers and 6th on the fastest-growing list.

What Kie.ai sells

Kie.ai sells one API key and one credit balance for other companies' models. Its pricing table has 590 price rows across 22 maker labels: video (Veo 3.1, Kling 3.0, Seedance 2, Runway), images (Nano Banana Pro, GPT Image 2, Flux), Suno for music, and language models including Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6.1 Sol and Gemini 4 Argon. Credits cost $0.005 each, 200 per dollar, on 582 of the 590 rows. New accounts get 80 free credits, about $0.40, and credits never expire. Kie.ai says failed tasks cost nothing.

Image, video and music jobs run as tasks: you get a task ID, then poll or receive a callback. The default limit is 20 new requests every 10 seconds; extra requests get a 429 error rather than a place in a queue.

The site is run by NEXUSAI SERVICES LLC and INNOLEAP AI LLC at a Denver, Colorado address, under terms effective August 1, 2025 and governed by Colorado law. Its footer reads "© 2026 kie.ai Inc.", a third name the About page does not explain.

Prices against the official APIs

Kie.ai says many models cost about 30% less than official prices, some far less. On the rows below it is lower than the makers and than the other three media services in most cases. Prices in US dollars, from each service's own pricing or model page, Google's Gemini API pricing (updated October 19, 2026) and Anthropic's pricing:

Model and outputMaker's listKie.aifalReplicateWaveSpeedAI
Veo 3.1 Fast, 8 s at 720p with audio0.80 (Google)0.301.201.201.20
Veo 3.1 Quality, 8 s at 1080p with audio3.20 (Google)1.2753.203.203.20
Nano Banana Pro, one 1K or 2K image0.134 (Google)0.090.150.150.14
Nano Banana Pro, one 4K image0.24 (Google)0.120.300.300.24
Kling 3.0 Standard, per second without / with audionot confirmed0.07 / 0.10 (720p)0.084 / 0.1260.168 / 0.2520.084 / 0.126
Seedance 2.0, per second at 720pnot confirmed0.2050.3034 (with audio)0.180.24
Claude Opus 5.5, per million input / output tokens4 / 20 (Anthropic)1.60 / 8.00not soldnot checkednot checked

Against the makers that is 62.5% off Veo 3.1 Fast, 60% off Veo 3.1 Quality, 33% off Nano Banana Pro at 1K or 2K (50% at 4K) and 60% off Claude Opus 5.5. Claude Sonnet 5.5 is $0.80 / $4 against Anthropic's $2 / $10.

Four cautions. Kie.ai's Veo 3.1 Fast price is per clip of 4, 6 or 8 seconds, and its Veo page calls audio experimental. Its Claude Opus 5.5 price is below Anthropic's own Batch rate of $2 / $10, with no explanation. Its discount column is headed "Official / Fal Price" and often uses fal's price: for Veo 3.1 Fast it shows $1.20, so its claimed 75% saving is 62.5% against Google. And it is not cheapest everywhere: Replicate charges $0.18 a second for Seedance 2.0 at 720p against Kie.ai's $0.205. Kling's and BytePlus's own prices could not be confirmed.

What Kie.ai does not say

Kie.ai's homepage, About page and terms do not say it is an authorised reseller or partner of Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Suno or any other maker, and they do not say how it gets access. Its terms say the trademarks shown "do not imply any endorsement". The homepage mentions "smart fallback routing" without saying whether a request can be served by a different provider or model version. No public comparison of its outputs with the makers' own APIs was found.

What public tests show

Artificial Analysis does not track Kie.ai, and no independent speed or failure-rate measurement was found. The public reviews are light on numbers:

  • AI Softing, a design and SEO agency, ran a two-week trial (July 22, 2026): onboarding took under 15 minutes, a support reply came about 10 hours later, and video tasks failed now and then and needed manual retries. It gives no counts.
  • Bitdoze (July 17, 2026), whose author says Kie.ai is the image backend of an agent they run in production, accepts the trade-off for an image pipeline but measures no speed or failure rates; its Kie.ai links are disclosed affiliate links.
  • AI Insights News (July 21, 2026) compiles others' findings, including a second-hand test in which 4 of 5 Nano Banana Pro calls failed without charge.
  • CometAPI, a competing API vendor, wrote in a "Kie.ai alternatives" post that Kie.ai's prices are not public; kie.ai/pricing is public.

What users report

Trustpilot shows 2.1 out of 5 from 16 reviews, 81% one star. Reviewers report jobs stuck at 99% while credits were used (June 24 and October 2, 2026; the October reviewer puts it at about one generation in five), paid access without top models (August 2026), 8 to 10 hours of HTTP 500 errors after a large top-up (May 10, 2026), an image-to-image API that ignored reference images (May 15, 2026), and Sora 2 outages with support only in Asian hours (January 2026). Two five-star reviews (March 2026) praise low prices, non-expiring credits, the docs and a patient support reply. Kie.ai replied in July 2026 that it does not alter results and that credits for failed tasks are returned automatically; it replies to 7% of negative reviews. Hacker News has no discussion of it.

MCP, Agent Skills and coding agents

No official MCP server was found in Kie.ai's docs: its llms.txt index and AI agent section list none. Third-party wrappers exist, such as a community package listed on Glama and a guide from AnythingMCP.

Kie.ai does publish two Agent Skills, installed with npx skills add https://kie.ai and a KIE_API_KEY. kie-models lets a coding agent pick one of 200+ image, video, music and speech models, read its parameters, upload files, submit tasks and download results. kie-chat-agents configures coding agents to run on Kie.ai's chat models. The docs name Claude Code, Codex CLI and Grok Build.

For Claude Code, Kie.ai serves Anthropic Messages at https://api.kie.ai/anthropic: set ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL to it and ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN to your key. For Codex CLI it serves the OpenAI Responses API at https://api.kie.ai/openai/v1. Gemini models get per-model OpenAI-style Chat Completions endpoints; the Gemini 4 Argon one documents tool calling and a Google Search tool, and returns errors with HTTP 200 and a code in the body. The Claude Code guide does not say whether prompt caching, extended thinking or web search work, and no official SDKs are listed.

Privacy, terms and who runs it

  • Kie.ai can suspend or end accounts "at our sole discretion" without notice.
  • Refunds are "supported if needed" by email with an order number, with no conditions or time window.
  • Generated media is kept 14 days and logs two months, per its docs. The privacy policy (effective August 1, 2025) covers only your email address and says nothing about prompts, uploads or whether they reach the model makers. The terms license your content to Kie.ai for operating and improving the service.
  • There is no public status page. The homepage claims both "99.9% Uptime" and "99% Availability".
  • Support runs on Discord and Telegram from 21:00 to 17:00 UTC.

How it compares with fal, Replicate and WaveSpeedAI

fal, Replicate and WaveSpeedAI charge more for Google's models but name their companies clearly, publish status pages and appear in Artificial Analysis' benchmarks; Replicate is also cheaper than Kie.ai on Seedance 2.0. For Claude and other chat models, OpenRouter bills at the providers' list prices plus a 5.5% fee on credit purchases. The makers' own APIs cost more but come with their data terms.

Who should skip it

Anyone sending confidential data, anyone who needs an agreement with the model maker, and production apps without a fallback provider. For cheap experiments with image, video or music models, the main risk is the credits you put in.

Sources

Sources

  1. Kie.ai homepage: savings claims, free credits, uptime claims (Kie.ai) (kie.ai), accessed
  2. Kie.ai pricing table (Kie.ai) (kie.ai), accessed
  3. Kie.ai pricing data behind its pricing table (Kie.ai) (api.kie.ai), accessed
  4. About Kie.ai (Kie.ai) (kie.ai), accessed
  5. Kie.ai terms of use (effective August 1, 2025) (kie.ai), accessed
  6. Kie.ai privacy policy (effective August 1, 2025) (kie.ai), accessed
  7. Kie.ai refund policy (Kie.ai) (kie.ai), accessed
  8. Veo 3.1 on Kie.ai (Kie.ai) (kie.ai), accessed
  9. Kie.ai docs: getting started, retention, rate limits, support (docs.kie.ai), accessed
  10. Kie.ai docs index (llms.txt) (docs.kie.ai), accessed
  11. Kie.ai docs: AI agent overview and skills (docs.kie.ai), accessed
  12. Kie.ai docs: Claude Code setup (docs.kie.ai), accessed
  13. Kie.ai docs: Codex CLI setup (docs.kie.ai), accessed
  14. Kie.ai docs: Gemini 4 Argon chat completions endpoint (docs.kie.ai), accessed
  15. Gemini API pricing: Veo 3.1 and Nano Banana Pro (Google, updated October 19, 2026) (ai.google.dev), accessed
  16. Claude API pricing (Anthropic) (platform.claude.com), accessed
  17. Kie.ai reviews: 2.1 out of 5 from 16 reviews (Trustpilot) (trustpilot.com), accessed
  18. Kie.ai review: two-week trial (AI Softing, July 22, 2026) (aisofting.com), accessed
  19. Kie.ai review (Bitdoze, July 17, 2026) (bitdoze.com), accessed
  20. Kie.ai review (AI Insights News, July 21, 2026) (aiinsightsnews.net), accessed
  21. Best Kie.ai alternatives (CometAPI blog, a competing vendor) (cometapi.com), accessed
  22. Kie.ai to MCP guide (AnythingMCP, third party) (anythingmcp.com), accessed
  23. kie-ai-mcp-server, a community MCP package (Glama listing) (glama.ai), accessed
  24. Hacker News search for kie.ai (Algolia) (hn.algolia.com), accessed
  25. Veo 3.1 on fal (fal) (fal.ai), accessed
  26. Nano Banana Pro on fal (fal) (fal.ai), accessed
  27. Kling 3.0 Standard text-to-video on fal (fal) (fal.ai), accessed
  28. Seedance 2.0 text-to-video on fal (fal) (fal.ai), accessed
  29. Veo 3.1 Fast on Replicate (Replicate) (replicate.com), accessed
  30. Seedance 2.0 on Replicate (Replicate) (replicate.com), accessed
  31. Veo 3.1 Fast on WaveSpeedAI (WaveSpeedAI) (wavespeed.ai), accessed
  32. Seedance 2.0 on WaveSpeedAI (WaveSpeedAI) (wavespeed.ai), accessed
  33. OpenRouter pricing (OpenRouter) (openrouter.ai), accessed
  34. AI产品榜 (AICPB), issue 40: web rankings for September 2026 (mp.weixin.qq.com), accessed

Changelog

Changelog

  1. Added September 2026 website visits from AICPB.
  2. Rewritten from Kie.ai's own pages, public tests and user reports checked on October 21, 2026; added MCP, Agent Skills and coding-agent support, and prices against fal, Replicate and WaveSpeedAI.
  3. Page created from public reporting and public tests.

Recommended from GenGrades

  • Comparison

    Kie.ai vs Higgsfield: API or studio for Veo, Kling, Seedance

    Kie.ai is a pay-per-call API for developers who want Veo 3.1, Kling, Seedance and other models behind one key, with credits that never expire. Higgsfield is a subscription web studio for creators and teams, with a separate API that undercuts Kie.ai on some models, such as Kling 3.0.

  • Tool review

    APIMODELS

    APIMODELS is a pay-as-you-go AI API relay that sells about 150 models through one key at its own prices, mostly below the makers' list prices, and spends the margin on backup channels: 98.62% of requests succeeded over 30 days, moderation rejections excluded. APIMODELS is our own product: it is made by the team behind GenGrades.

  • Tool review

    WaveSpeedAI

    WaveSpeedAI is an API platform, run by a Singapore company and a Hong Kong company named in its terms, that sells 1,000+ image, video, audio and 3D models plus an LLM service on one balance. It matches fal on Kling 3.0, charges above Google's list for Veo 3.1 Fast and accepts Alipay and WeChat Pay.

  • Tool review

    Vercel AI Gateway

    Vercel AI Gateway is Vercel's hosted API for about 480 text, image, video and speech models behind one key, billed from prepaid credits at the providers' list prices with no markup, including when you bring your own keys. It became generally available on August 21, 2025, and gives each Vercel team 5 USD of free credit a month.

  • Tool review

    Replicate

    Replicate is an API for running AI models, owned by Cloudflare since a $57.4 million acquisition closed on December 1, 2025. It sells 100+ official models such as Veo 3.1, Nano Banana Pro and Kling 3.0 per output, and 50,000+ community models by the second of GPU time.

  • Tool review

    fal

    fal is a San Francisco API platform, run by Features & Labels, Inc., that sells per-output access to more than 1,000 image, video, audio and 3D models on one prepaid balance. Its open models are cheap, but Google partner models such as Veo 3.1 Fast and Nano Banana Pro cost more on fal than on Google's own API.